кто знает английский помогите пожалуйста!!!!нужно написать сочинение 20 предложений на тему what makes a good lawyer  

a good criminal lawyer should be, above all, a man writing. And especially - a lawyer in criminal cases of fraud and other cases involving economic crimes. Do not write anything back, then the client must appear reasonable doubt if they need a lawyer at all.

The purpose of lawyer work - vkrapit in hopeless gloomy, thick, black ink written clerical book tentatively entitled "The criminal case against Vassily Doe of committing fraud in Part 4 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code "normal, natural, human understandable and, most importantly, evidence-legal texts that will address the legal and factual errors and lead author of the customers of this book: the protection must be identified fatal errors of the victim, which served as the immediate cause of its large financial losses, unforgivable mistakes handwriting expert, without evidence, reporting on a stable set of the handwriting of the accused in some dubious document, errors suspicious investigator, constantly and flagrantly tramples on the norms of criminal procedure during the investigation and, finally, some minor errors of the defendant, a cousin whose grandfather during the last Russian-Turkish war survived a difficult childhood of war, then what most tragic impact on the fate of his beloved grandson, and, ultimately, resulted in addition to the dock.

In every joke has some truth. But in reality the way it is. Seriously, the problem of counsel in a criminal case - to prevent the deliberate distortions, falsification, random errors and information gaps have led to an incorrect legal assessment of the case the prosecutor and the court, and further - to an illegal conviction. All of these distortions and falsifications of counsel must be promptly and, importantly, it is revealing opened, recorded on paper, and thus become apparent to anyone who picks up a criminal case. And here without the ability and desire to be competent attorney not to manage documents. The position of defense simply must be embodied in the documents (complaints and petitions) and filed a criminal case.

Moving on. A good lawyer should be quick and proper reaction to an unexpected proposal by the investigator. For example, the investigator proposes to pass the incoming defendant is now in vogue in cases of fraud examination with a polygraph (lie detection). What should I do? Give up? But in this case the value of the testimony of the defendant will be zero. Agree? But the great risk of getting a negative result. Here, the lawyer must demonstrate its high level, choose the right solution and help his client with the dignity out of difficult situations.

At least so. This is a lawyer at least.

But this, of course, is not enough to protect the highly skilled. High-class criminal lawyer should be able to see in a developing situation in the case of a chance to justify his client, and be able to use this chance. I have already written. But to see these professionals as a defender (or lack thereof) to the client, the non-specialist it is difficult if not impossible, therefore, confine ourselves here to those made by the general observation.

And finally. If a lawyer offers to solve all your criminal problems in the most radical way, giving a very good investigator or a bribe to the judge, think about the cancellation of the agreement. In 9 cases out of 10 it is - fraud attorney (Article 159 of the Criminal Code). Your blood will be certainly assigned to intermediaries (who - you never know), and the criminal case will roll on as if you had never parted with their money.

He protects people, who commits a crime. Что то вроде этого