Кино и театр

нужен полный ответ или статья(в английском варианте)

на этот вопрос Should the actor live the part or should he just perform?
Acting profession, perhaps the only one where a man (his psychophysics) is both a craftsman and tool, and the product of professional activity. Also modern scientific studies confirm that the processes of creativity and schizophrenia, are identical, only the schizophrenia leads to the destruction of personality and the creative process - for edification and enrichment. These circumstances impose some imprint on the behavior of the actor, which, of course, can not affect the representation by others of the profession.
The first circumstance makes it impossible to assess the finished product from the actor. Carpenter, who made the stool, can objectively evaluate their work - good or ill. Actor such a possibility does not physically. Therefore, he seeks recognition and attention of others to their activities not only and not for reasons of vanity, but also because of the assessment of the product - good or bad. That is why the external silence is often "kills" the actor.
Both facts together educate peculiar psyche of the actor, when to recharge your professional baggage a person must constantly monitor its internal state, these adding to their emotional memory - the material needed to create new roles. This leads to the fact that even at moments of maximum emotional upheaval in the imagination of the actor is always a subject, which tracks all of the (kind of like a split personality, is not it?). People who do not know it, is not versed in this, such behavior seems a little odd. It grows legends and anecdotes about the actors, formed attitude to acting fraternity, as people not of this world.
Елена Пак
Елена Пак
57 386
Лучший ответ

Похожие вопросы