Сочинение на тему "Зачем нужно искусство" на английском языке

Over time, within the so-called artistic process, each new course, school, begins with the direction that declares his view of art - namely, the function of art. Function in society, and so simple at all. Exists for art? Where it begins where it ends and what is needed? What is art and what is not? The complexity of these issues suggests at least that for thousands of years they had been given no answer. But because of the lack of response the question itself will not disappear. It seems to me that the assertion that art reflects life - it's true, but not the whole truth. Art, especially literature, not only and not just shows life as it forms. Thus, forms. Let us recall the works of world literature. The real tragedy was the entry stamp "The Sorrows of Young Werther" Society has stirred up a wave of suicide, as young people, trying to be like your favorite hero, repeating his actions! Readers to imitate the actions of the character - that is the focus. Hence, the theory of Aristotle, according to which the art - the mirror of nature, ie. Art imitates the world, and only the hook - fails ...And indeed, as if art were brought up, if it had not formed a reality?

The influence of art in general, literature in particular, a person is not confined to commonplace educational function. In "The Sorrows of Young Werther" was not a single word about that to commit suicide - this is a decent exit from a difficult situation! Nevertheless, many readers were blind to that temptation inheritance. Hence, the influence of art out of what was said, vine dektarovanymi principles is "good" and "bad". It turns out - and let me forgive all the fabulist world - not so moral effect on the reader as a story. Simple plot.

In fact, the mechanisms of perception, the reader's understanding and experience of the text has not yet been investigated, even scientists. Perhaps a partial understanding of the mechanisms available unless the artist himself, and then - equal to some inferior creative instincts! Starting from the ancient writers who sought to evoke in the reader a catharsis - a sense of inner purification through empathy with the characters - ending modernistsWho saw in the work of a sacred act, and the writer was considered a carrier of sacred truth, which he symbolically sets forth in their lyrics - artists of all peoples at all times set ourselves a goal of creative and somehow it reached. Hence, the question of the mechanism of the effect of art is completely open, and the question of objective art provide answers to the artists themselves, and almost every ten or twenty years, the answer varies. Probably, it should be: Within each era art changes the direction of influence, a new highlight key points - from the primitive to the didactics of the so-called "pure art". Perhaps by changing the style and purpose, changing the form and content, art and meets the urgent need for humanity.

And yet ...What does the art? What function it performs? Someone from the philosophers said, very pertinent: The answer to those questions are still unanswered, is that these questions should be put differently. Most likely, the problem of predestination art has still not been solved, not because it is difficult, but because the very attempt to give an answer to these questions are wrong! Ie own search of one, a categorical response is already a mistake, wrong way. Art has existed for millennia. This is quite in order to justify its existence. And maybe art - not "for what?", And art "as ..,». Art's sake.. No, of art as ...So, art as life. And of course, life as art!