Лингвистика
Нужен топик по английскому на тему "I want to be a critic".Помогите пожалуйста)
Помогите пожалуйста) Буду очень признательна)))
Introduction
A reviewer, regardless of the art form, has a responsibility to readers to be knowledgeable about the specific art form. Reviewers do not simply express opinions. There’s a huge difference between “I liked Killer Ants Devouring Lithuania,” and “Killer Ants Devouring Lithuania was a good movie.”
In the former, you’re only expressing a personal opinion based on your likes and dislikes. You have the right to that opinion, but as a reader, my reaction is, “who cares?” I want to know about the movie or book, not about you. In the latter, you have a set of criteria by which you can judge the work of art. Too many people fail to see or accept that distinction. If you fall into this category, you’ll write lousy reviews of no interest to the reader; you’ll merely be feeding your own ego by seeing your name in print.
But if you study the medium, its history and trends, if you can break a performance into its component parts to evaluate how they fit together, if you can put your review into the context of similar works, then you’re offering valuable insights that will help readers decide whether to experience the art, and you’re teaching them how to enhance their experience and appreciation.
Here’s where it gets messy. These criteria are not completely objective nor are they totally subjective. They lie somewhere in between. But if you deny the criteria and claim that all opinions are subjective, why bother to review anything at all? Your opinion carries no more weight than a three-year-old watching the same movie.
What follows are standards used by professional critics, and few people have the time to engross themselves this thoroughly in an art form. Don’t be overwhelmed by the complexity; rather, use this article as a starting point, adopting ideas and concepts that make sense and recognizing that, to become a good critic, you never stop studying the medium.
It’s also important to emphasize that while there’s not one right way to write a review, there are essential elements that make it either a good or bad one.
http://blogcritics.org/culture/article/so-you-want-to-be-a/ там продолжние
A reviewer, regardless of the art form, has a responsibility to readers to be knowledgeable about the specific art form. Reviewers do not simply express opinions. There’s a huge difference between “I liked Killer Ants Devouring Lithuania,” and “Killer Ants Devouring Lithuania was a good movie.”
In the former, you’re only expressing a personal opinion based on your likes and dislikes. You have the right to that opinion, but as a reader, my reaction is, “who cares?” I want to know about the movie or book, not about you. In the latter, you have a set of criteria by which you can judge the work of art. Too many people fail to see or accept that distinction. If you fall into this category, you’ll write lousy reviews of no interest to the reader; you’ll merely be feeding your own ego by seeing your name in print.
But if you study the medium, its history and trends, if you can break a performance into its component parts to evaluate how they fit together, if you can put your review into the context of similar works, then you’re offering valuable insights that will help readers decide whether to experience the art, and you’re teaching them how to enhance their experience and appreciation.
Here’s where it gets messy. These criteria are not completely objective nor are they totally subjective. They lie somewhere in between. But if you deny the criteria and claim that all opinions are subjective, why bother to review anything at all? Your opinion carries no more weight than a three-year-old watching the same movie.
What follows are standards used by professional critics, and few people have the time to engross themselves this thoroughly in an art form. Don’t be overwhelmed by the complexity; rather, use this article as a starting point, adopting ideas and concepts that make sense and recognizing that, to become a good critic, you never stop studying the medium.
It’s also important to emphasize that while there’s not one right way to write a review, there are essential elements that make it either a good or bad one.
http://blogcritics.org/culture/article/so-you-want-to-be-a/ там продолжние
Похожие вопросы
- Почему в этом предложении перед словом "child" употреблен артикль "а"? When i was a child i dreamed to be a pilot
- Пожалуйста, помогите с английским! Нужно раскрыть скобки, глагол to be.
- АНГЛИЙСКИЙ ЯЗЫК. Вставьте правильный глагол TO BE, TO HAVE, TO DO
- What do you want to be И Who do you want to be - в чем разница?
- Нужен топик по английскому "Мой любимый фильм". Помогите, пожалуйста.
- Нужен топик или сочинение по английскому на тему ЛЮБОВЬ. ОЧЕНЬ НУЖНО!!! Срок до завтра, помогите пожалуйста
- this is going to be a good party ...почему для будущего времени используется is going to be а не will
- Had to означает только "надо"? можно ли сказать there had to be a way. или нужно только there should be a way?
- Как правиль но по английски? I want in the United States or I want to the United State ?
- Верно составлена фраза с инверсией? Not until I'll become the best of the best can't I suppose me to be a success man.