Лингвистика

Please can you check my essay about censorship . Thanks everybody

2. Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?(Cambridge IELTS 4)
Musicians, artists, actors, film directors, poets and novelist have always played a crucial role in development of the society. There has been always a censorship by authorities. The aim of the censorship was to restrict freedom of expressions by cultural figures.
I don't fully agree that all culture figures' ideas to be restricted. For example, let's compare the most talented poet of Russian Pushkin and the youth film which is broadcasted on TV in Russia.
The great Russian poet Pushkin lived in at the end of the eighteenth century and in the beginning the nineteenth century. His poems are still a subject of admiration people not only over Russian but in many other countries. His was very populated and loved by people but elite. Many his poems were devoted to freedom of people and praised democratic principles and value and calling equality of people. Most of his poems were forbidden to spread even upon penalty death and he was driven into exile for several years. So in my view, it is not acceptable when the government limits the speech of freedom.
On the other hand, some censorship can be very useful for society. For example, two years ago a youth film was launched on TV. The characters of this film were using offensive and rude words. According to the plot of this film, it is good and fashionable to swear, to change partners frequently, not to respect adults, and moreover to be antisocial. Thanks to complaints of parent whose children were into this antisocial film and censorship organizations this film was stopped to be broadcasted.
To summarize, I firmly believe, censorship sometimes is valuable as it is able to prevent spreading antisocial elements but certainly it should not limit the freedom of speech and be a suppression of democracy.
the development; there has always been censorship by the authorities.I don't fully agree that all ideas of cultural figures were restricted; Pushkin, ..poet of Russia; which is broadcast;
lived at the end of the eighteenth century; The great Russian poet Pushkin lived in at the end of the eighteenth century and in the beginning the nineteenth century. (предложение неочень хорошо сформулировано, надо перефразировать, получается как-то некрасиво: "жил в конце 18 века и начале 19 века"). Пушкин родился в 1799 году, один год до 19 века! Поэтому он поэт 19 века. Уберите 18 век совсем.
AT the beginning OF the nineteenth century.
His poems are still admired by people not only over Russia but in many other countries. He was very popular and loved by people but elite. were devoted to LIBERTY of people (freedom - разг. ) and THEY praised democratic principles and valueS and equality of people.
were forbidden to spread even upon penalty death - WERE FORBIDDEN UNDER THREAT OF DEATH
limits the speech of freedom. - the liberty of speech
not to respect adults - DISRESPECT
censorship organizations this film was stopped to be broadcasted - THE censorship organizations MADE this film BE CEASED to broadcast
THE censorship sometimes (НАВЕРНО, МОЖНО УЖЕ С АРТИКЛЕМ ОПРЕДЕЛ).
Наталья Камаева
Наталья Камаева
1 296
Лучший ответ
Cambridge IELTS 4.

Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Musicians, artists, actors, film directors, poets and novelistS have always played a ____ ЗАМЕНИТЬ! role in development of the society. There has been always _____ ПОРЯДОК СЛОВ! a censorship by authorities. The aim of the censorship was to restrict freedom of expressions by cultural figures.

I don't fully agree that all culture figures' ideas to be restricted ______ ГРАММАТИКА! For example, let's compare the most talented poet of Russian ОШИБКА! Pushkin and the youth film _____ СТИЛЬ! which is broadcasted on TV in Russia.

The great Russian poet Pushkin lived in at the end of the eighteenth century and in the beginning the nineteenth century. His poems are still a subject of admiration people______ ОШИБКА! not only over Russian______ОШИБКА! but in many other countries. His was very populated and loved by people but elite.______ ОШИБКА.

Many his poems were devoted to freedom of people and praised democratic principles and value and calling equality of people. Most of his poems were forbidden to spread even upon penalty death and he was driven into exile for several years. So in my view, it is not acceptable when the government limits the speech of freedom.

On the other hand, some censorship can be very useful for society. For example, two years ago a youth film was launched on TV. The characters of this film were using offensive and rude words. According to the plot of this film, it is good and fashionable to swear, to change partners frequently, not to respect adults, and moreover to be antisocial.

Thanks to complaints of parent whose children were into this antisocial film and censorship organizations this film was stopped to be broadcasted. To summarize, I firmly believe, censorship sometimes is valuable as it is able to prevent spreading antisocial elements but certainly it should not limit the freedom of speech and be a suppression of democracy.

А lot of mistakes. Special references (allusions) are required for Cambridge IELTS 4. Good luck!