Лингвистика

Please can you review my essay about character& Thank you all

Task 2: People’s character is influenced by environment rather than genetics. Do you agree or disagree?
Numerous scientists claim that both genes and the environment play a significant role in shaping one's character. Research conducted by leading scientific institutions has shown that, while some character traits are inherited, most are acquired through experience during lifetime.
Let's consider cases which clearly demonstrate the strong link between the environment and a person's character.
Everyone has their own unique DNA, except for identical twins, who share the same DNA. Many studies have been done involving hundreds of identical twins who were raised apart, in very different environments. These observations showed that twins really share some traits such as a preference to the same colors or smell, books and films. At the same time their essential character is quite differ from each other and most psychologists explained it by the influence of their environments. For example, one of the twins was brought up in the countryside the other in the city. Countryside twin is unflappable, taciturn, withdrawn, and hard working. Quite the opposite is the city twin. He may be described as talkative, open and temperamental and a little a couch potato.
There is no doubt that influence of the environment and nurture is more obvious and convincing than genes. For example, parents try to rent or buy home in morally healthy neighborhood far from crime- ridden ones in the hope that their children would not be under bad influence.
By and large, people are closely connected with parents, co-workers, friends, teachers, peers as well as media. They are important factors. Moreover, they may be responsible for forming characters of those who communicate with them in everyday life.
All these arguments lead the the conclusion that the environment contributes more to shaping an individual's nature than genes. Indeed, the influence of nurturing is so overwhelming and powerful that criminologists state criminals are often the result of bad parenting or bad nurturing.
Numerous scientists claim that both genes and environment play a significant role/part in shaping one's character. Research conducted by leading scientific institutions has shown that, while some character traits are inherited, most are acquired through experience during lifetime.
Let's consider cases which clearly demonstrate the/a strong link between environment and a person's character.
Everyone has a unique DNA, except for identical twins, who share the same DNA. Many/ a lot of studies have been done/conducted involving hundreds of identical twins who were raised apart, in very different environments. (These) observations showed that twins really share(d) some traits such as a preference to/for the same colors or smell, books and films. At the same time their essential character is/was quite different from each other/one another and most psychologists explained it by the influence of their (respective) environments. For example, one of the twins was brought up in the countryside, the other in the city. The countryside twin was unflappable, taciturn, withdrawn, and hard working. Quite the opposite was the city twin. He may be described as talkative, open/outgoing, temperamental, and a little on the couch potato side.
There is no doubt that the influence of the environment and nurture is more obvious and convincing than genes. For example, parents try to rent or buy a home in a (morally) healthier neighborhood far from crime-ridden ones in the hope that their children would not be/fall under bad influence.
By and large, people are closely connected with/influenced by parents, co-workers, friends, teachers, peers, as well as the media. These are important factors. Moreover, they may be responsible for forming characters of those who communicate with them in everyday life.
All these arguments lead to the conclusion that it is the environment that contributes more to shaping an individual's nature than genes. Indeed, the influence of nurturing is so overwhelming and powerful that criminologists state criminals are often the result of bad parenting or bad nurturing.
АБ
Анастасия Богатых
62 023
Лучший ответ
Анастасия Кузнецова Thanks a lot
Happy New Year
Task 2: People’s character is influenced by environment rather than genetics. Do you agree or disagree?
Numerous scientists claim that both genes and the environment play a significant role in shaping one's character. Research conducted by leading scientific institutions has shown that, while some character traits are inherited, most are acquired through experience during lifetime.
Let us consider cases which clearly demonstrate the strong link between the environment and a person's character.
Everyone has their own unique DNA, except for identical twins, who share the same DNA. Many studies have been done involving hundreds pairs of identical twins who were raised apart, in very different environments. These observations showed that twins do really share some traits such as a preference for the same colors or smells, books and films. At the same time their essential character is quite differ from each other and most psychologists explained it by the influence of their environments. For example, one of the twins was brought up in the countryside, the other in the city. The rural twin is unflappable, taciturn, withdrawn, and hard working. The urban twin is quite the opposite. He may be described as talkative, open and temperamental and a little bit of a couch potato.
That's why, there is no doubt that influence of the environment and nurture is more obvious and convincing than genes. For example, parents try to rent or buy homes in wholesome neighborhood far from crime- ridden ones in the hope that their children will not be amid bad influences.
By and large, people are profoundly influenced by their parents, co-workers, friends, teachers, peers as well as media. These are important factors of life have a profound influence on one's nature. Moreover, they may be responsible for forming the characters of those who communicate with them in everyday life.
All these arguments lead to the conclusion that the environment contributes more to shaping an individual's nature than do genes. Indeed, the influence of nurture on one's past is so overwhelming and powerful. That is why criminologists state that criminals are often the result of bad parenting or bad nurturing